Testing the Limits of European Ambitions on Emissions

Europe’s Ambitious Climate Goals Raise Concerns

The European Union’s agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 per cent from 1990 levels by 2030 has been applauded for its ambition. However, experts question whether the plans put forward by European leaders are strong enough to achieve this goal. Additionally, there are doubts about whether a 40 per cent cut is sufficient to stay on track toward the longer-term target of reducing emissions by 80 to 95 per cent by mid-century.

Europe accounts for only 13 per cent of global emissions, and while its efforts are commendable, it is just one piece of the global climate puzzle. The agreement among the EU’s 28 national leaders in October aimed to provide momentum for global climate negotiations taking place in Lima, Peru and leading up to the major summit in Paris the following year.

Despite Europe’s commitment, concerns remain. Concessions demanded by coal-dependent Poland weakened the deal, and experts worry that the politics involved may prevent necessary action until it is too late. Climate change experts emphasize that more drastic measures are needed to limit warming to 2 degrees Celsius, considered the threshold for catastrophic changes.

Europe is currently on track to meet its current goal of reducing emissions by 20 per cent by 2020. The 40 per cent target for 2030 may not be set in stone. If other nations do not make strong commitments at the United Nations climate meeting in December 2015, European leaders have agreed to reconsider their goal. The ambiguity surrounding this decision leaves room for interpretation.

Businesses and governments are concerned about global competitiveness and pressure European leaders to consider the actions of other nations. There is concern that if Europe acts alone, it could have negative consequences for its industries. Some suggest that Europe should revise its 40 per cent target if a meaningful global climate agreement is not reached.

While the agreement has its shortcomings, it is still considered a significant achievement. Climate change is less polarizing in Europe than in the United States, making it easier for European nations to come to a consensus. However, Europe alone cannot solve the climate crisis.

The recent emissions agreement between the United States and China has boosted hopes for a strong international deal. The European agreement for 2030 sets an overall target, but individual nations will decide how to achieve their emissions cuts. This shift from the 2020 framework, where each nation had specific goals, has both advantages and disadvantages.

Europe’s carbon-trading market, the Emissions Trading System, is seen as a crucial tool, but its current form is not effective due to a surplus of pollution permits keeping prices too low. An effective carbon price is needed to achieve the 40 per cent reduction target.

Experts stress that achieving a 40 per cent reduction is much more challenging than the previous 20 per cent goal, which was relatively easy to meet. Climate policies will need to drive the necessary changes, and this presents a whole new set of challenges.

twitterlinkedin